“Can Social Media Resolve Social Divisions,” written by
danah boyd does not read as an inquiry essay because the author performs
neither an experiment nor an exploration. Reading this essay, it is more of an
analytic and observatory paper on the social divisions in modern society. The
beginning of this essay observes an issue and presents different groups of
people that are analyzed, but no other question is being asked. Rather than an
inquiry essay, it is more of a rhetorical essay. Danah states that technology
can be and was made to be a tool to end social division. However, she claims
that the existence of technology neither creates nor magically solves cultural
problems. Boyd writes, “In fact, their construction typically reinforces
existing social divisions.” She utilizes pathos when describing stories of
black or Asian students. Hateful comments from racist students that the author
included manipulates the audience to sympathize (possibly even empathize). Boyd
also discusses segregation in everyday life and states the comforts of human
nature. Technology makes it possible to socialize with a variety of different
cultures, but people tend to connect with those they know and with whom they
have the most in common. The author uses a lot of examples and clear
distinctions that support her claim that racial divisions are existing. Another
example she uses is the distinction between Myspace and Facebook. The essay
describes white students moving on to a newer and cooler Facebook, while the “ghetto”
were still lingering within the old and boring Myspace. Facebook and Myspace
have such big culture gaps that people start to categorize identities among
social media. Danah Boyd finishes her essay by making a bold statement, “We don’t
live in a postracial society, and social media is not the cultural remedy that
some people hoped it would become… Instead, it lays bare existing and
entrenched social divisions.” At the end of this essay, boyd does answer the question:
the answer to the title. However, it seems to me as though it is not an inquiry
essay.
No comments:
Post a Comment