Equality is a relatively new
revolutionary issue worldwide. From early Christianity to the Renaissance women
were completely inferior to men, secluded in job opportunities, limited in
wage, and excluded from public life. Until
the end of the 19th century, women were politically unable to voice
their opinions. However, the 19th amendment, which granted women’s rights,
was ratified on August 18th, 1920. Since then, women gradually were
accepted into diverse professions, were non-limited to teaching nor a homestay
mother. In 2015, the gender wage gap between full time female and male workers
was 20%. Currently in the House of Representatives, women hold 84 of the 435
seats: 19.3%. Nowadays, with so many activist groups and special interest
groups having a large voice in our political and everyday lives, it is hard to
find an unbiased stance on the issue of gender equality. With education and perseverance,
women are realizing that success is nearly impossible if not an equal
opportunity is given. Although women are becoming more involved within the
government over the past decade, it seems that our country has a hard time accepting
the idea that women should have equal opportunity in profession and wage. On
the one hand, it is psychologically proven that women have more nurturing,
compassionate, and sensitive characteristics to qualify for watching children
at home, becoming a teacher, or being a nurse. People also believe that gender
equality is too extreme and that women are asking for too much. On the other
hand, other people, especially “feminists” today in our society, desire equal
treatment and not be discriminated. A wide variety of mediums express their
view on gender equality with particular rhetorical strategies to convince
society that gender equality is essential. Across formal and informal discourse,
why is it that writers with less editorial oversight engage more with the
audience through emotional appeal than formal writings?
No comments:
Post a Comment